From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-07 05:46:32
Sadly, I think it's probably too late for these improvements to make it in,
but there's still a chance...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daryle Walker" <darylew_at_[hidden]>
> 1. Since the "tie"-ing code has moved from the utility library, the
> declaration of the "boost::tied" class template should be removed from
> 2. The HTML file that lists all the libraries needs some edits.
> A. Under the "miscellaneous" section, the listing of the utility library
> should only mention "noncopyable," since the other items in that library
> already given in the other listings that library gets in other sections.
I understand the reasons, but don't think I agree. Utility is such a
catch-all that it makes sense to have at least one category that shows all
of its functionality.
> B. The base-from-member idiom library needs to be listed.
If you send me a proposed patch to the libraries page, I'll be happy to
BTW, base_from_member.html consistently says "template class", where the
modern usage is "class template". Even the C++ standard is being revised to
use the latter wording.
David Abrahams, C++ library designer for hire
C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk