|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-01 22:55:32
The type_traits docs include this table entry:
-----------
::boost::is_member_pointer<T>::value
Evaluates to true only if T is a cv-qualified pointer to a data-member or member-function.
3.9.2
8.3.3
On some compilers, member function pointers may be incorrectly identified as regular pointers.
------------
The final remark confuses me. The way it's worded, it doesn't seem to imply anything about is_member_pointer<T>, but about is_pointer<T> instead. If that's the case, shouldn't it appear in the entry for is_pointer (and then, couldn't we fix is_pointer by returning false when is_member_pointer returned true)? If that's not the case, shouldn't it be reworded as follows:
On some compilers, is_member_pointer<T>::value is always false
...and can we say something about which compilers have this property?
===================================================
David Abrahams, C++ library designer for hire
resume: http://users.rcn.com/abrahams/resume.html
C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)
email: david.abrahams_at_[hidden]
===================================================
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk