Boost logo

Boost :

From: bill_kempf (williamkempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-15 13:19:02

--- In boost_at_y..., "terekhov" <terekhov_at_d...> wrote:
> --- In boost_at_y..., "bill_kempf" <williamkempf_at_h...> wrote:
> [...]
> > Not true. All that would be required is to have the Boost
> > synchronization primitives built on top of a complex condition
> > variable that can watch both the state it's interested in (such
> a
> > mutex being unlocked) and for a cancellation request.
> > Trivial to implement
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Really? Perhaps then I did something wrong here:

I don't see anything wrong with what you did, though I didn't read
the code too closely. What makes you assume you must have done
something wrong because of what I just said?

Bill Kempf

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at