Re: first sight

From: bill_kempf (williamkempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-15 13:19:02

--- In boost_at_y..., "terekhov" <terekhov_at_d...> wrote:
> --- In boost_at_y..., "bill_kempf" <williamkempf_at_h...> wrote:
> [...]
> > Not true. All that would be required is to have the Boost 
> > synchronization primitives built on top of a complex condition 
> > variable that can watch both the state it's interested in (such 
as 
> a 
> > mutex being unlocked) and for a cancellation request. 
> > Trivial to implement
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Really? Perhaps then I did something wrong here:
> 
> http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3B0BA709.973337EB%40web.de

I don't see anything wrong with what you did, though I didn't read 
the code too closely.  What makes you assume you must have done 
something wrong because of what I just said?

Bill Kempf