Re: [boost] Smart pointer poll

From: Mark Rodgers (mark.rodgers_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-03 15:47:43

From: "Mark Rodgers" <mark.rodgers_at_[hidden]>
> I do need to break cycles, but when I do, I normally just use a plain 
> pointer.  How is a weak_ptr better?

Scratch that - I've suddenly seen the light.   It's not for the 
situations where I store a plain pointer; it's for the situations where
I don't store a pointer at all.  Hmmm, maybe it is useful after all.  
I thought it probably was....  ;-)

Mark