Boost logo

Boost :

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-24 13:09:40

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: 1022263709 7035 (24 May 2002 18:08:29
X-Complaints-To: usenet_at_[hidden]
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 18:08:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
Sender: news <news_at_[hidden]>
Subject: [boost] Re: Semaphores?
X-BeenThere: boost_at_[hidden]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b1
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: boost_at_[hidden]
List-Help: <mailto:boost-request_at_[hidden]?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:boost_at_[hidden]>
List-Subscribe: <>,
List-Id: Boost mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>,
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 18:07:14 -0000

David Abrahams wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alexander Terekhov" <terekhov_at_[hidden]>
> > David Abrahams wrote:
> > >
> > > To make this post more than just list pollution,
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > Is this your 'IMHO' or rather *THE DWA-MODERATOR'S VERDICT*?
> It was my opinion as a list participant and a moderator. However, it could
> easily become my verdict, since you persist in ignoring requests about the
> tone and style of your posts. I'm not going to waste any more time on this,
> though; I feel I've done what my job as moderator requires me to do in
> public - a nudge in the right direction. This being a moderated list, we

Uhmm. Such classification of the "pollution" bit above is 'kinda
funny' to me, really. IMHO, I'd classify such style of moderation-
in-public as being something "ala Monty Python style, nailing people's
heads to coffee tables for transgressing the unwritten rules." ;-)

Ok. Ok. I'm sorry (just kidding/relaxing a bit). Excuse me, please!


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at