Re: [boost] Dynamic Bitset Formal Review June 8-17

From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-13 15:47:39

On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Dan'l Miller wrote:
>   I would appreciate it if you were to negotiate each of your
> incremental post-C++98 evolutions of STL with either someone at SGI
> (or even STLport) in a team-oriented approach.  I would apprecieate it
> if either 1) dyn_bitset were to appear as part of SGI STL or 2) an SGI
> STL alternative displaced boost::dyn_bitset.  Prior to my defect

NEWS FLASH: Alex Stepanov and Matt Austern don't work for SGI anymore (and
haven't for a couple years now).

So I hate to break it to you Dan'l, but as Chuck pointed out, Boost is the
best forum we have for new C++ libraries, and as Dave brazenly admitted
too, yes, our goal is world domination! (joke) The really funny thing is,
the only person I know that is upset about this is you.

Regards,
Jeremy

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jeremy Siek                          http://www.osl.iu.edu/~jsiek/
 Ph.D. Student, Indiana Univ. B'ton   email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
 C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)   office phone: [phone]
----------------------------------------------------------------------