From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-13 16:55:29
On Friday 14 June 2002 04:42, Toon Knapen wrote:
> That's why for the moment I just added '-tpp6' and not '-axK' for instance
> because the latter is pentium III specific (tpp6 is valid from the pentium
> pro onward)
Yes but IIRC even Pentium code can be created by using -tpp5. Having -tpp6 by
default might make this impossible.
> > The funny thing is that the observed behaviour qualifies for a bug
> > report, as the documentation says that -tpp6 is on by default. At least
> > for version 6. You sure are using a current version, aren't you? :-).
> Yep : 6.0.
> I did'nt see it in the documentation that it's on by default but I did
> notice the difference ?
Intel C++ Compiler Users Guide
Document No. CL-600-06
says it's on by default
says it's off by default
-- Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet Hannover voice: +49(0) 511 762 - 4273, fax: +49(0) 511 762-3001 http://www.ive.uni-hannover.de
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk