Re: [boost] Re: Iterator Adaptor Poll

From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-26 10:07:41

On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, David Abrahams wrote:
dave>
dave> As a replacement for the existing iterator_adaptor? Do you really
dave> want to drop "adaptor" from the name? It's not a "Policy builder"
dave> pattern, after all...

Well, iterator_adaptor really has two purposes: adapting and creating from
scratch. It seems to me that the name "builder" encompasses both of these
purposes better than "adaptor".

Cheers,
Jeremy

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jeremy Siek                          http://php.indiana.edu/~jsiek/
 Ph.D. Student, Indiana Univ. B'ton   email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
 C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)   office phone: [phone]
----------------------------------------------------------------------