From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-27 02:42:47
Eric Friedman wrote:
> As I mentioned in an earlier email, I am partial to the name "delayed
> metafunction" (and, according, mpl::delay[N] instead of
> Seeing as I couldn't find any replies to that message, however, I am
> willing to cast my runoff vote in favor of "quoted metafunction" and
Sorry, I didn't mean to ignore your post; just missed it. I replied to it a
few minutes ago, so you should be able to read it soon ;).
> Basically, metafunction-class really doesn't do it for me. It seems
> like it doesn't do it for too many other people either. And I'll be
> glad to see mpl::meta_fun bite the dust ;)
Okay, vote counted.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk