|
|
Boost : |
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-27 03:30:34
> But anyway, I think I've already been stubborn enough to prove that a few
> people would _really_ like to see the terminology changed :), so, I am
> interested to see how many people on this list prefer one term ("quoted
> metafunction") to another ("metafunction-class"). If "metafunction-class"
is
> going to be voted down, so be it.
1. Could you please give formal (or semiformal) definition to the thing you
are trying to name here?
2. Sorry for my ignorance: What quoted means in this context?
Gennadiy.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk