From: Eric Woodruff (Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-12 16:42:55
[Un?]fortunatly, as far as I know, the end user is required to specifiy the
exceptions they would like propagated.
----- Original Message -----
From: Mitch Adler
Sent: Monday, 2002:August:12 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: Attempting resolution of Threads & Exceptions Issue
>1) thread<void> threads call terminate(), thread<XXX> threads propogate the
>exception when join is called.
Propogating an exception in an different thread context than it started
in (different stack, specifically) is a hard, if not impossible, problem.
Just copying an exception so it will survive, typed correctly, the exit
of a catch clause seems daunting.
What mechanisms does boost.threads rely on/require such that this works
[I have skipped parts of the threads/exceptions discussion, so please
point me at the relavent postings if I've missed the discussion of this
-- Mitch Adler "Could you please continue the petty Apple Computer, Inc. bickering. I find it most intriguing." Mitch_at_[hidden] - Data MAdler_at_[hidden] _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk