From: William E. Kempf (williamkempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-12 18:32:21
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]>
> "That's why I think the functionality may indeed be useful at
> this library level, but only as a non-default option, to eliminate the
> incorrect perception and force the programmer to think about what [s/]he's
> (but at the same time making the exception passing uniform and easy)."
> I think everyone agree's here, so what's the problem?
I don't think everyone agrees here.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk