|
Boost : |
From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-13 23:36:39
At Tuesday 2002/08/13 21:06, you wrote:
>Are you saying that all exceptions have to be derived from std::exception?
I haven't seen anyone claim that.
>In my specific case, I'm using omniORB, and I don't think it's exceptions
>are derived from std::exception. With no manor to propagate exceptions
>because the library was biased.
>
>Exception handling has no direct association with std::exception.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. std::exception clearly has an
association with exception handling (at least in the standard library).
>If it is
>my design perogative to use exceptions in a manor that gives me dynamic
>return types then I may choose to throw an integer or anything else.
integer is a particularly poor choice, IMO ...well maybe double would be
worse :)
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
PGP RSA fingerprint = 4D20 EBF6 0101 B069 3817 8DBF C846 E47A
PGP D-H fingerprint = 98BC 65E3 1A19 43EC 3908 65B9 F755 E6F4 63BB 9D93
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk