Re: [boost] boost test documentation problems

From: Ronald Garcia (garcia_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-14 11:51:04

Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:

>>Why no plain HTML?
>>    
>>
>Why not plain text then?
>
For most boost libraries, the web pages are the only documentation 
available.  I tend to use non-browser tools to generate quality 
(somewhat :) ) printouts and postscript/pdf files of the documentation.  
Javascript hinders my ability to do so.

IMHO, so long as HTML is the Boost standard documentation format, I 
think we should keep things restricted to vanilla HTML.  I am all for 
using tools to generate that HTML where useful and do so myself, but I 
think the distributed docs should be simple.

ron