RE: [boost] boost test documentation problems

From: David Bergman (davidb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-14 12:15:25

Why not TeX with no LaTeX whatsoever? It would be great to see all those
mbox:es again ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Ronald Garcia
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 12:51 PM
To: boost_at_[hidden]
Subject: Re: [boost] boost test documentation problems

Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:

>>Why no plain HTML?
>>    
>>
>Why not plain text then?
>
For most boost libraries, the web pages are the only documentation 
available.  I tend to use non-browser tools to generate quality 
(somewhat :) ) printouts and postscript/pdf files of the documentation.

Javascript hinders my ability to do so.

IMHO, so long as HTML is the Boost standard documentation format, I 
think we should keep things restricted to vanilla HTML.  I am all for 
using tools to generate that HTML where useful and do so myself, but I 
think the distributed docs should be simple.

ron

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost