From: David Bergman (davidb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-14 12:15:25
Why not TeX with no LaTeX whatsoever? It would be great to see all those
mbox:es again ;-)
[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Ronald Garcia
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] boost test documentation problems
Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:
>>Why no plain HTML?
>Why not plain text then?
For most boost libraries, the web pages are the only documentation
available. I tend to use non-browser tools to generate quality
(somewhat :) ) printouts and postscript/pdf files of the documentation.
IMHO, so long as HTML is the Boost standard documentation format, I
think we should keep things restricted to vanilla HTML. I am all for
using tools to generate that HTML where useful and do so myself, but I
think the distributed docs should be simple.
Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk