RE: [boost] Boost.Test progress

From: Rozental, Gennadiy (Gennadiy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-15 02:09:33

I changed implementation function name to prevent ambiguity, since there is
no real need in this overloding. Let me know if this problems still exist.

Gennadiy.

-----Original Message-----
From: Fernando Cacciola
To: boost_at_[hidden]
Sent: 8/14/2002 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test progress

> Therefore, I think we could leave the macro as it originally was and
> change
> every usage of it where *there is* an implicit conversion which *do
> causes*
> ambiguity. This is the route taken by Peter Dimov.