Boost logo

Boost :

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-20 07:56:49

At 04:41 AM 8/20/2002, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:

>> Well, that isn't quite right. "inline" isn't 100% right either, but it

>> seems better than "online" to me.
>I think that inline would be misleading (at least for the Test/Program
>Execution Monitor headers ) since in fact library is implemented offline.
>Maybe we could separate it into
>boost/test/minimal.hpp or boost/test/lightweight.hpp ?

I think changing the directory name to "basic", "lite", "lightweight", or
similar would be better:


>> >One question is open though: what features minimalist test header
>> >support?
>> I was just thinking of the V1 features. It might be OK to add to the
>> feature set, but the whole point is to be minimalist. So less is
>> IMO. After all, anyone who wants more can use the full framework.
>Ok. I will work on it. How much time do I have?

Well, if you check it in before Thursday, 6 AM US East Coast time, we can
do some testing before the branch for release later in the day.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at