[boost] Re: Re: Re: Boost.Test online?

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-20 09:01:34

"Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:4.3.2.7.2.20020820085314.023cc928_at_mailhost.esva.net...
> At 04:41 AM 8/20/2002, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>
>  >> Well, that isn't quite right.  "inline" isn't 100% right either, but
it
>
>  >is
>  >> seems better than "online" to me.
>  >I think that inline would be misleading (at least for the Test/Program
>  >Execution Monitor headers ) since in fact library is implemented
offline.
>  >Maybe we could separate it into
>  >
>  >boost/test/online/test_execution_monitor.hpp
>  >boost/test/online/prg_execution_monitor.hpp
>  >and
>  >boost/test/minimal.hpp or boost/test/lightweight.hpp ?
>
> I think changing the directory name to "basic", "lite", "lightweight", or
> similar would be better:
>
>    boost/test/basic/...

But there is nothing basic or lite in test_execution_monitor.hpp and
prg_execution_monitor.hpp. It's simply inlined through direct source
inclusion of all sources.

Gennadiy.