Re: [boost] Library names: MPL

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-24 07:58:26

From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
> 
> But I'd like to raise the issue with the whole list.  Boost is getting 
> bigger. A primary directory, library, namespace, or header, or other 
> important name needs to be more explicit than MPL.  Acronyms are obscure 
> and make a library less accessible to new users.

MPL? Less accessible to new users because of the acronym? ;-)