From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-24 11:19:15
From: "Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]>
> "> q19) In reality why wouldn't q5's technique for handling an uncaught
> exception thrown in a nonjoinable t apply equally well to handling an
> uncaught exception thrown in a joinable t as well? (Why have two
> instead of one?)<
> To support threads that are able to return a value."
> The threads can support return values without exceptions, they are
> orthogonal, but necessary, concepts.
What value do you return when the thread function has ended with an
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk