Re: [boost] RFC: Example file for using Pascal-Like Set Class

From: spamjunk (spamjunk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-24 15:17:40

You did.  My bad.  My convention, and the one I'm use to, is to use the
"camel hump" convention for type names: no underscores, and capitalization
all words.  But I will follow the STL convention in this code.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <vawjr_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2002 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] RFC: Example file for using Pascal-Like Set Class

> At Saturday 2002/08/24 09:28, you wrote:
> >I have upload an example code file detailing how to use the Set Class to
the
> >file's section of the Boost Users' group at Yahoo.  I would appreciate
some
> >comments on the interface.  It will help refine it before I submit it.
> >
> >I currenlty have it working with:  gcc 3.1 (both Linux and DJGPP), VC++
6.0
> >SP 5, and BCC 5.5.1.  Although, BCC currently can't handle the SetOf
> >template for created compile-time sets.  It seems to get confused with
> >template parameter default values.
> >
> >I am still deciding on a class name.  Victor A. Wagner, Jr. suggests
> >PowerSet.  I am also toying with PascalSet and PackedSet.
>
> I hope I suggested powerset, not PowerSet.
>
>
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Rich
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
> Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
> PGP RSA fingerprint = 4D20 EBF6 0101 B069 3817 8DBF C846 E47A
> PGP D-H fingerprint = 98BC 65E3 1A19 43EC 3908 65B9 F755 E6F4 63BB 9D93
> The five most dangerous words in the English language:
>                "There oughta be a law"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>