Re: [boost] Zero Unnecessary Temporary Objects: A Revolution

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-10 19:45:55

At 06:05 PM 10/10/2002, David Abrahams wrote:

 >... If you're worried about making a fool of
 >yourself, think how I'll feel if we propose unneccessary language
 >changes for move semantics ;-)

For those who don't understand Dave's comment above, see 
http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1377.htm, "A Proposal 
to Add Move Semantics Support to the C++ Language" by Howard Hinnant, Peter 
Dimov, and Dave Abrahams.

--Beman