From: John Maddock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-11 05:54:37
> Note that "result pattern" feature is not there. I could implement it if
> agree that it is useful.
Accepted, hold your fire for now, I'm accumulating quiet a few comments on
the unit-test library as I'm progressing and will come back to you in due
course. For now though two documentation nits:
The test tools docs don't seem to mention which header they are contained
The other docs refer to header names (unit_test_suite.hpp for example),
without mentioning that it's really <boost/test/unit_test_suite.hpp>.
You might need to check your docs for the other topics as well and make sure
all the needed headers are clearly listed...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk