From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-07 15:04:36
"John Maddock" <jm_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> If this fails to compile, we may need to add a dummy "return 0;" at
>> the end. I know of two compilers which act this way: Metrowerks and
> What do you want to call it?
I'm not happy with it, but...
BOOST_NO_NON_RETURN_PATH_COMPREHENSION is the best I could come up
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk