From: Gabriel Dos Reis (gdr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-07 15:16:49
Gennaro Prota <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]> writes:
| --- Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr_at_[hidden]> wrote:
| > Gennaro Prota <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]> writes:
| > [...]
| > | Well, in fact those subsequent paragraphs intentionally give very few
| > | guarantee, and reinterpret_cast<void*> is exactly one of the cases
| > | which are left unspecified (the guarantee of 5.2.10/7 concerns casting
| > | to pointers to *object types*). So I guess there's not much room for
| > | proving your equivalence.
| > Clause 4 defines, among other things, what it means to convert a T* to
| > a void*. Certainly, that clause defines implicit conversions; but it
| > is not just about that.
| Yes. But, as I said, here it's a matter of *how* do you do the conversion. As
| to doing it with reinterpret_cast, 5.2.10/1 says:
| "Conversions that can be performed explicitly using reinterpret_cast
| are listed below. No other conversion can be performed explicitly
| using reinterpret_cast."
| Where is it listed that you can do a conversion to void*?
Do you mean it is invalid to reinterpret_cast<> to void*?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk