|
Boost : |
From: William E. Kempf (wekempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-09 09:50:13
> From: David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
> "William E. Kempf" <wekempf_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> > That's a good idea. So would users prefer new exception types here,
> > or should I use the std:: exceptions?
>
> IMO, it's always safer to use an exception type which provides
> more-specific information.
What extra information do you want provided?
William E. Kempf
wekempf_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk