[boost] Re: Borland C++ Builder patch 4 released

From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-27 06:22:53

FYI I've submitted it as QC#3629

Russell

Paul Mensonides wrote:
> Russell Hind wrote:
> 
> 
>>Sorry to say that the output is now incorrect.  A2 instead of A 2.
>>Checking the preprocessor output for this gives
>>
>>/* Unit1.cpp 9: */int main() {
>>/* Unit1.cpp 10: */std::cout << "A 2" << &std::endl;
>>/* Unit1.cpp 11: */return 0;
>>
>>which is again correct.  This is strange since I thought that bcc32
>>was
>>just supposed to call cpp32 for the pre-processing.  I can submit this
>>as a bug to Borlands QualityCentral if you like (but don't hold your
>>breath).
> 
> 
> :(
> 
> I'm not surprised, but I was hoping....  If they fixed this bug, Borland would
> be able to use the "strict" configuration of the pp-lib.  I'd still need the
> same hacked configuration for Sun and IBM (they have similar bugs), but at least
> Borland's wouldn't need it.
> 
> Please do submit a bug report.  I think they've already gotten this one before
> though, so I'm not holding my breath. ;)
> 
> Thanks again for the help,
> Paul Mensonides
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>