From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-05 10:04:51
Paul Mensonides wrote:
> I'm not surprised, but I was hoping.... If they fixed this bug,
> Borland would be able to use the "strict" configuration of the
> pp-lib. I'd still need the same hacked configuration for Sun and
> IBM (they have similar bugs), but at least Borland's wouldn't need
I recently reported the preprocessor bug that keeps BOOST_PP_EXPAND()
from working to IBM.
The example you gave here is preprocessed correctly by the Visual Age
preprocessor for both version 5 and 6.
Do you have any more specific examples that I could try and report to IBM?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk