Re: [boost] [config] BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-06 09:40:47

Daniel Frey <daniel.frey_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Agreed. I didn't know about the other MACROs. I just found the one (or
> two?) occasions where BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME was used. Generally I think
> it's better to have things as local as possible, but if the above
> workaround is needed often, it might make sense to keep the macro and if
> I understand you correctly, the new macro will replace all of the above
> macros, right?

That would be the idea.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com