Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-06 13:41:27

Next message: Joel Young: "Re: [boost] coding style"
Previous message: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve: "Re: [boost] RC_1_30_0 compile error with SGI MIPSpro Compilers"
In reply to: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve: "Re: [boost] RC_1_30_0 compile error with SGI MIPSpro Compilers"
Next in thread: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve: "Re: [boost] RC_1_30_0 compile error with SGI MIPSpro Compilers"
Reply: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve: "Re: [boost] RC_1_30_0 compile error with SGI MIPSpro Compilers"

"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Is the __BORLANDC__ branch different from (not as good as) the
> is_base_and_derived implementation in 1.29.0?

cvs diff knows for sure.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Joel Young: "Re: [boost] coding style"
Previous message: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve: "Re: [boost] RC_1_30_0 compile error with SGI MIPSpro Compilers"
In reply to: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve: "Re: [boost] RC_1_30_0 compile error with SGI MIPSpro Compilers"
Next in thread: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve: "Re: [boost] RC_1_30_0 compile error with SGI MIPSpro Compilers"
Reply: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve: "Re: [boost] RC_1_30_0 compile error with SGI MIPSpro Compilers"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk