From: Geurt Vos (g.vos_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-12 06:18:50
> >Is there any reason boost::filesystem::path doesn't
> >provide a swap(path &) function? If there is, I think
> >the docs should explain why, but if there isn't, well,
> >can it still be implemented before 1.30.0 goes gold?
> Let me turn the question around and ask what your
> expectations would be for
> a swap member beyond what is already offered by std::swap?
> No throw guarantee?
Yes. That is, this is the main (or actually only)
reason for asking.
> More efficient?
I guess with a swap member, you kind of get this for free.
With filesystem::path I consider this a non-issue, though.
I mean, the time a possible extra copy takes is negligible
to retrieving a directory listing or parsing a config file
(opened using filesystem::ifstream).
> Or are you asking that filesystem::path satisfy more container
No, a no throw 'swap' will suffice...
I mean, except for swap, filesystem::path
is complete enough for what I use it for.
So I obviously also don't really care about
other requirements (looking at it from a
user point of view).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk