From: Paul A. Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-12 06:36:26
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Gennadiy Rozental
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 10:15 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [boost] Re: I/O library formal review
> > * newl needs a bit more rationale. How is cout << newl different from
> > << '\n'? How is it better?
> Maybe newl does not reset the manipulators? If it true it should be spelled
> out explicitly. In any case I also like to see an example where newl is
> preferable to << '\n'.
Is there a speed advantage - because flush is quite expensive?
We should have some evidence for this?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk