From: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve (rwgk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-12 12:27:36
I see new features being added to RC_1_30_0.
Is this the right balance of innovation and stability?
I've spent several days cleaning up RC_1_30_0 for a large number of platforms.
It takes a long time to do all the compilations and tests. Do I have to do this
all over again to salvage my significant investment?
I wish the rules for release candidates are much stricter: NO new features
after branching, only bug fixes and portability fixes should be allowed. If
everybody keeps squeezing in new features at the last minute the whole idea of
having a release candidate is obsolete.
--- Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Here is my list of outstanding patches and fixes. It would be great if we
> could resolve the bulk of these for 1.30.0.
> If you resolve any of these issues, please let me know so I can clear it
> off the list.
> * lexical_cast changes
> Kevlin and Terje doing final tests on changes.
> * Boost.Python private email
> Final changes promised for Wednesday night.
> * Possible addition to operators library from Sam Partington
> Daniel Frey and Sam discussing changes.
> * Regex "make boost work better" patch from Lars Gullik Bjønnes
> John Maddock will investigate once new machine working
> * Multi-array constructor patch
> Has been applied, but caused Win32 Metrowerks "constructors"
> test failure.
> * [bgl] pass by value
> Awaiting response from Jeremy
> * PRB with type_traits::is_member_function_pointer
> Would prefer John Maddock or someone else more familiar with type
> traits regeneration make this change.
> * Does this compiler need configuring
> Howard has provided patch, but need Mac person to apply and test.
> * [config] BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME
> Status currently unknown. John? Aleksey?
> * [Boost.Python] rpms and small fix for RedHat
> Awaiting reply. Dave?
> * [status/Jamfile] Jamfile patches for Borland
> Need a decision. Dave?
> * [Boost.Regex] [PATCH] Fix GCC 3.3 warnings from Lars Gullik Bjønnes
> Awaiting response from John.
> * tuples::apply
> Did this every get resolved? Aleksey? Jaakko?
> * [Boost.Test] Request for const fix in unit_test_suite.hpp
> Posted 12 Feb 2003. Did this ever get resolved? Gennadiy?
> --- end ---
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk