Re: [boost] Outstanding patches and fixes

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-13 08:49:46

At 11:42 AM 3/12/2003, Sam Partington wrote:
 >Daniel Frey wrote:
 >> Beman Dawes wrote:
 >>>
 >>> * Possible addition to operators library from Sam Partington
 >>>    Daniel Frey and Sam discussing changes.
 >>
 >> We need some discussion of it and I would like to see it in CVS and
 >> thus in the regression tests for some time. When Sam started the
 >> proposal, the branch for 1.30.0 has already happened (IIRC) and to
 >> me, this means bug-fixes only. I don't know when exactly you are
 >> planning to release
 >> 1.30.0, but if there is enough time and Sam (and others) would like to
 >> see the addition ASAP, we can try to push things a bit. Currently,
 >> it's an 1.31.0 item as far as I'm concerned. Sam, is this OK for you?
 >
 >Well, I would love to get in 1.30, but I think it may take a little 
longer
 >that we'd hope.  I've just spotted a problem with the private operator
 >int()
 >implementation which breaks almost every single operators test going!  I
 >will elaborate when I've done more testing.
 >
 >So yes, unfortunately, I think we're looking at a 1.31 item.

Daniel and Sam,

I've removed this from the do-list for 1.30.0, but feel free to start 
making changes to the CVS main trunk any time you want.

--Beman