Re: [boost] Re: Outstanding patches and fixes

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-13 08:46:02

At 11:52 AM 3/12/2003, Alisdair Meredith wrote:

 >I have also reported and not seen rejected:
 >(easily lost in the volume surrounding a release)
 >
 >[2 Random fixes also required for Graph]
 >
 >===================================================================
 >RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/boost/random/uniform_smallint.hpp,v
 >retrieving revision 1.20
 >diff -r1.20 uniform_smallint.hpp
 >190a191,192
 >> #elif defined( __BORLANDC__ )
 >>   typedef typename detail::uniform_smallint< boost::is_float<typename
 >UniformRandomNumberGenerator::result_type>::value == false
 >>::BOOST_NESTED_TEMPLATE impl<UniformRandomNumberGenerator, 
IntType>::type
 >impl_type;
 >
 >and
 >
 >===================================================================
 >RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/boost/random/uniform_int.hpp,v
 >retrieving revision 1.21
 >diff -r1.21 uniform_int.hpp
 >208a209,210
 >> #elif defined( __BORLANDC__ )
 >>   typedef typename detail::uniform_int< boost::is_float<typename
 >UniformRandomNumberGenerator::result_type>::value == false
 >>::BOOST_NESTED_TEMPLATE impl<UniformRandomNumberGenerator, 
IntType>::type
 >impl_type;
 >
 >The __BORLANDC__ test should be replaced by a defect-tagging macro
 >covering Borland's inability to use BOOST_STATIC_CONST constants as
 >template parameters.

Alisdair, no one has stepped forward to suggest how to replace the 
__BORLANDC__ test. Thus you need to figure this out yourself, or contact 
other Boost developers privately for help with it.

Thanks,

--Beman