From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-18 07:11:13
Daniel Frey wrote:
> I'm still wondering what happened. Please check everything what I say,
> as I already made too many errors wrt type-traits:
> John added the test for is_function to the code that was intended for
> compilers that don't have partial specialization - which is why it
> failed as is_function needs partial specialization to work with
> references. But is_class also calls is_reference, so it seems that
> this does work, thus I think an implementation could be possible.
Most probably. I know that the last time I looked into it (which was
right before the 1.29 release) there were some subtleties which I
wasn't ready to deal with, not the least because the timing was wrong
Don't get me wrong, I would love to see it fixed, just not in 1.30.0.
> But there is another point: AFAIK the GCC does support partial
> specialization, right?
> Given that this is true, the change in CVS can't fix something
> (as it is not used for the GCC)
It wasn't supposed to.
> or the config for the GCC is broken - or I missed something obvious
> (again) :-} Even if we don't take the last point into account as it
> was maybe just an overlook from John when he accidentially committed
> the code to CVS,
That's exactly what happened.
> it's still the question whether is_function could be "fixed" given
> that is_reference seems to be available for compilers without partial
Sure. By all means it would be appreciated if someone contributed a
comprehensive fix which would close the issue.
> > If it was easy enough it would be fixed long before the release. In
> > any case, I would be strongly opposite to sticking in a new
> > implementation just now. It's bad enough "the patch" got us delayed
> >for more than a day.
> I don't really wanted to suppose changes that defer the 1.30.0, I just
> tried to find a way to work around the lock-problem of SourceForge.
Okay, that's good to hear :), sorry if I overreacted a bit. 1.30.0
preparation period has lasted long enough for some of us to want it to
be over already.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk