From: Daniel Frey (daniel.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-18 08:29:12
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Daniel Frey wrote:
>>it's still the question whether is_function could be "fixed" given
>>that is_reference seems to be available for compilers without partial
> Sure. By all means it would be appreciated if someone contributed a
> comprehensive fix which would close the issue.
>>I don't really wanted to suppose changes that defer the 1.30.0, I just
>>tried to find a way to work around the lock-problem of SourceForge.
> Okay, that's good to hear :), sorry if I overreacted a bit. 1.30.0
> preparation period has lasted long enough for some of us to want it to
> be over already.
Maybe I should start to work on it now, but *not* for 1.30.0. This would
give us enough time to have it in the mainline CVS to avoid
time-pressure. As I don't have much time these days anyway, I think I'll
try to create a fix for is_function in the next weeks. I'll not hurry as
the problem is neither new nor severe. And if it works (and with some
kind help ;) maybe we can fix it for 1.31.0... :)
-- Daniel Frey aixigo AG - financial training, research and technology Schloß-Rahe-Straße 15, 52072 Aachen, Germany fon: +49 (0)241 936737-42, fax: +49 (0)241 936737-99 eMail: daniel.frey_at_[hidden], web: http://www.aixigo.de
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk