Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-24 09:18:48

Next message: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] Re: [date_time] enabling microsec_clock under C++Builder"
Previous message: Douglas Paul Gregor: "Re: [boost] Determining interest in combining_iterator"
Next in thread: Fernando Cacciola: "[boost] Re: Un-named unions and Borland Internal Compiler Error"
Reply: Fernando Cacciola: "[boost] Re: Un-named unions and Borland Internal Compiler Error"

Line 56 of optional.hpp states that Borland ICEs if the union is
un-named. This is correct for C++Builder 5 (0x551), but C++Builder 6
Update 4 (0x564) doesn't have this problem.

Not worth removing it but just thought I'd point it out incase anyone is
interested.

Cheers

Russell

Next message: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] Re: [date_time] enabling microsec_clock under C++Builder"
Previous message: Douglas Paul Gregor: "Re: [boost] Determining interest in combining_iterator"
Next in thread: Fernando Cacciola: "[boost] Re: Un-named unions and Borland Internal Compiler Error"
Reply: Fernando Cacciola: "[boost] Re: Un-named unions and Borland Internal Compiler Error"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk