[boost] Re: Un-named unions and Borland Internal Compiler Error

From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-24 11:59:42

Russell Hind <rhind_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:b5n441$f6i$1_at_main.gmane.org...
> Line 56 of optional.hpp states that Borland ICEs if the union is
> un-named.  This is correct for C++Builder 5 (0x551), but C++Builder 6
> Update 4 (0x564) doesn't have this problem.
>
> Not worth removing it but just thought I'd point it out incase anyone is
> interested.
>
Thanks for the info!

Fernando Cacciola