From: Paul A. Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-08 12:18:50
Thanks. This indeed looks improved in several ways.
Norm function is better idea - might also be user defined version for user
I may get some time to try some other refinements and experiments. (Would
several zeros be better casted to type T in case T is a user defined type (an
interval type perhaps?)?)
Testing on NIST test data (tricky) is also a must. We mustn't follow Excel -
and get the wrong answer!
Paul A Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 8AB UK
+44 1539 561830 Mobile +44 7714 33 02 04
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Neal D. Becker
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 1:22 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Statistics code example (this time with code)
> On Monday 07 April 2003 08:06 am, Neal D. Becker wrote:
> > I made some improvments to the previous code. The old code used the "abs"
> > function, which might or might not be defined for all data types we want to
> > support. Now it uses our own "Norm" function.
> > Also the "count" is cast to "value_type" to avoid warnings.
> > Sorry, I haven't had time to incorporate other suggestions posted here.
> > Feel free to modify.
> Sorry, forgot the attachment:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk