Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Bronek Kozicki (brok_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-21 13:23:26

Next message: Chuck Messenger: "[boost] Re: Formal Review: Command Line & Config library"
Previous message: Patrick Kowalzick: "[boost] Re: proposal for efficient geom. vector class"
In reply to: Giovanni Bajo: "Re: [boost] Comeau/como-win32 regression test results"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] Comeau/como-win32 regression test results"

Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> should never include any Windows header. That's because we know that
> Windows headers can't be compiled in strict mode, can they?

These headers cannot even be compiled in Microsoft's own compilers, when
started with "disable language extenstions" option, ie. /Za

Next message: Chuck Messenger: "[boost] Re: Formal Review: Command Line & Config library"
Previous message: Patrick Kowalzick: "[boost] Re: proposal for efficient geom. vector class"
In reply to: Giovanni Bajo: "Re: [boost] Comeau/como-win32 regression test results"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] Comeau/como-win32 regression test results"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk