From: Marcelo E. Magallon (mmagallo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-22 02:55:20
I have just a couple of comments after reading Chuck's Review and
Vladimir's replies. I have written a similar library for internal use,
although not as comprehensive.
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 03:43:58PM -0400, Chuck Messenger wrote:
> * Library-managed default values
Yes, this is a definite plus.
> * Adaptive formatting (first field width)
Vladimir says that changing the output (after adding more options)
could be confusing for the user. I beg to disagree. autoconf
generated configure scripts had no facility to adjust the formatting
according to the widest option and the output is very confusing since
it's hard to tell appart option descriptions from option names.
A question of my own:
How to handle non-option arguments? e.g. "$ cat file", I'm sure it's
there but I couldn't spot it in the documentation.
I took a couple of my programs and replaced my own library by
program_options. It went quite well and I found program_options to be
simple to use.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk