From: John Torjo (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-22 06:56:43
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bronek Kozicki" <brok_at_[hidden]>
To: "Boost mailing list" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 8:15 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] smart_assert - ready for a test drive
> John Torjo <john_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > - critical (this is critical, the app. probably became unstable)
> err... khem, did you considered "fatal" instead of "critical" ? It has 5
> letters, no more than other levels ... And maybe add another level
> "info" ?
True. Done... It's fatal now...
> > Default logger dumps all details of the assertion to
> > a file called './asserts.txt'.
> I think that opening file without any code written by programmer is bad
> idea. It just does not seem fair. My proposal is : *require* to let
> programmer explicitly specify class responsible for writing, and provide
> generic one (it can write to file "./asserts.txt" , but still has to be
> selected by programmer in some place). Such class may do other things
> instead of writing to file, like write to debug output
> (OutputDebugString(LPCTSTR) in Windows - this is what I prefer when
> debuging my code)
True. You're right. I will think how to implement this.
About OutputDebugString - I will even provide a logger that does just this.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk