From: Neal D. Becker (nbecker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-17 10:08:10
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 10:49 am, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> I've put together a plan of post-review developement of the program_options
> library --- see attachemnt. I believe it includes all issues raised. If
> anybody mage a suggestion which got lost, or has any opinion on the
> document, I'd be interested to know.
Postional parameters looks like an interesting addition. I guess this is what
is commonly called "non-option arguments"?
Will non-option arguments be able to be placed anywhere on command line, like
gnu getopt style?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk