Re: [boost] [program_option] post-review plan

From: Neal D. Becker (nbecker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-17 10:08:10

On Tuesday 17 June 2003 10:49 am, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> I've put together a plan of post-review developement of the program_options
> library --- see attachemnt. I believe it includes all issues raised. If
> anybody mage a suggestion which got lost, or has any opinion on the
> document, I'd be interested to know.
>

Postional parameters looks like an interesting addition.  I guess this is what 
is commonly called "non-option arguments"?

Will non-option arguments be able to be placed anywhere on command line, like 
gnu getopt style?