From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-08 13:55:02
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Glen Knowles wrote:
>> The Common Public License already has a section in the wiki and fails
>> the boost requirements as shown.
> Yeah. That "review process" was really entertaining. Thanks for the
> reminder. "Must be simple to read and understand" is rather
> don't you think? As for "Must not require that the source code be
> available for execution or other binary uses of the library"... well,
> what's the problem? www.boost.org was pretty stable, thus far.
The answers to questions 12 and 18 from
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk