Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-08 13:57:04

Alexander Terekhov <terekhov_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Glen Knowles wrote:
> [...]
>> The Common Public License already has a section in the wiki and fails
>> the boost requirements as shown.
> Yeah. That "review process" was really entertaining. Thanks for the
> reminder.

Glad we could brighten your day.

> "Must be simple to read and understand" is rather subjective, don't
> you think?

Yes. That doesn't make it unimportant.

> As for "Must not require that the source code be available for
> execution or other binary uses of the library"... well, what's the
> problem? was pretty stable, thus far.

The problem is that we don't want to force companies to assume the
risk that will stick around.

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at