From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-08 13:57:04
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Glen Knowles wrote:
>> The Common Public License already has a section in the wiki and fails
>> the boost requirements as shown.
> Yeah. That "review process" was really entertaining. Thanks for the
Glad we could brighten your day.
> "Must be simple to read and understand" is rather subjective, don't
> you think?
Yes. That doesn't make it unimportant.
> As for "Must not require that the source code be available for
> execution or other binary uses of the library"... well, what's the
> problem? www.boost.org was pretty stable, thus far.
The problem is that we don't want to force companies to assume the
risk that www.boost.org will stick around.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk