From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-17 11:24:55
Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> At 09:36 AM 7/17/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
> >Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >> See win32-1_30_1 on http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/
> >> I found I had to update the .../tools/build sub-tree to the current
> >> main trunk in order to get the latest toolsets. Other than that, the
> >> tests were run on the RC_1_30_0 branch.
> >How can I tell if there were regressions?
> Regressions compared to the current main trunk or to the 1.30.0 release?
> One simple way to spot regressions compared to the current main trunk
> is to look at VC++ 7.1.
That only tells me about one compiler, and the main trunk (which I
don't care about).
> Except for Boost.Signals, it is currently passing 100% of all
> tests. Thus any failures are regressions compared to the current
We're not trying to get things to be as good as the current CVS; we
just want "better than 1.30.0".
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk