Re: [boost] Fun PP lib example

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-06 16:01:12

Peter Dimov wrote:
> Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> >
> > There is another variation of the idiom, sometimes called "hidden
> > state", which doesn't have the shortcoming in the first place:
> >
> >     class foo
> >     {
> >      public:
> >         foo();
> >         foo(int);
> >
> >         int f() const;
> >         void g(double*);
> >
> >      private:
> >         struct state;
> >         scoped_ptr<state> m_state;
> >     };
>
> Missing ~foo, possible undefined behavior. :-)

Not here :). I intentionally didn't qualify 'scoped_ptr'; ours works just
fine :).

Aleksey