[boost] Re: the boost::signal sample crashes

From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-07 08:12:08

John Maddock wrote:
> 
> I'm wondering how complicated to make this - one option would be to do
> something a little like the config system does and have:
> 
> #ifdef BOOST_ABI_INCLUDE
> #include BOOST_ABI_PREFIX
> #endif
> 
> // code...
> 
> #ifdef BOOST_ABI_INCLUDE
> #include BOOST_ABI_SUFFIX
> #endif
> 
> 
> Some of those warnings can get pretty pesky at times
> 

Yes, and it is nice to get rid of them, but they may end up being 
library specific.  e.g. date_time causes tag used before definition but 
does that mean its worth disabling that for all boost headers in BCB?
> 
> Does adding codeguard info break the ABI?  I didn't think it did so (there
> are no codeguard protected std libraries for example), and I mix and match
> codeguard and non-codeguard code all the time without any apparent issues...
> 

Not sure, I just put it in to play safe.  If you've had no issues with 
it, then I guess not.  Providing they share the same RTL (which they 
should) or memory is allocated and deleted by the same RTL, then it 
shouldn't affect CodeGuard.

> 
> I'm slightly tied up this week, but I'll try and add something to regex and
> see how it looks.
> 

I'm not sure how to proceed with this so if there is anything I can do 
in the meantime, let me know.  Feel free to e-mail me off the list.

Thanks

Russell