|
Boost : |
From: Chris Trengove (trengove_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-15 21:28:57
"Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:20030816012411.M99213_at_crystalclearsoftware.com...
> I don't think the it is technically a union because the result draws in
> points in the time period that aren't part of either of the initial
periods.
> Anyway I wrote the code as merge_inclusive so unless you have a major
> objection I'll leave it that way pending a better idea...
Yes, of course, it is not really a union either. I think merge_inclusive is
fine.
Chris
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk