Boost logo

Boost :

From: Chris Trengove (trengove_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-15 21:28:57

"Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> I don't think the it is technically a union because the result draws in
> points in the time period that aren't part of either of the initial
> Anyway I wrote the code as merge_inclusive so unless you have a major
> objection I'll leave it that way pending a better idea...

Yes, of course, it is not really a union either. I think merge_inclusive is


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at